Upwards with SBS – SBSisyphus’ Weblog

Just the Fax – Where did it go? Pt. 2 …as in ‘why isn’t the default viewer opening up my .tif?’ – Vista edition

May 13, 2009 · Leave a Comment

 

Just the Fax – Where did it go? Post Office 2003 SP3 Blues – **note** this former blog entry pertained to XP and its instructions are still relevant; however, Vista presents its own unique challenges

Just the Fax – Where did it go? Post Office 2003 SP3 Blues « Upwards with SBS – SBSisyphus’ Weblog

The above link is from XP and Office 2003 days gone bye.  In the new era of Vista we have a new problem, .tif files are not opened by this same program and registering the .dll mentioned in the former blog article won’t set thing straight.  Instead you will have to attempt to open a .tif and then choose the correct program file along with “always” to set this as the default program for .tif viewing going forward.

The default should be the Windows Photo Gallery.  To choose this to open the single targeted file and not a whole gallery, rather than select the Windows Photo Gallery program instead choose to browse to %systemdrive%\Program Files\Windows Photo Gallery\PhotoViewer.dll.

You can also do this without invocation by instead opening Default Programs (Winkey – Default Programs) and then specifying by file type association the above path and file.

**note** Quicktime seems to like to set itself to open .tiff files so just change that one too why you are at it.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

SBS 2008 – How to repair Exchange 2007

April 28, 2009 · Leave a Comment

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Disaster & Recovery · Exchange · SBS

SBSC’s – Must Pass Exam to Retain Certification

April 28, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Pass one of the following technical Exams
Small Business Specialist partners must employ or contract with at least one person by location who has passed one of the five technical exams listed here.*

1 Exam 70-655 TS: Windows Vista, Pre-Installing for OEMs will be available in February, 2009 as a Small Business Specialist technical exam, eligible for credit toward a Small Business Specialist designation.

Note: (**for existing SBSC’s**)  If you passed either Exam 70-282: Designing, Deploying, and Managing a Network Solution for Small- and Medium-Sized Business or Exam 74-134: Pre-installing Microsoft Products and Technologies to receive your Small Business Specialist designation,

your exam credentials must be updated by October 31, 2010.

See qualifying exams above to help you retain the value of your Small Business Specialist partner designation and Microsoft Certified Partner (MCP) credential.

source:  https://www.smbizspecialist.com/AspxFiles/Home.aspx


If you have any questions about the Small Business Specialist Community partner program or need help:

email sbscful@kpcorp.com, or call (888) 298-6303

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Certification · SBS

Post SBS 2008 migration and now need data from SBS 2003 NTBackup media – what to do now?

April 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

image

(picture is linked to download)

If you find that there is missing information after the migration has completed (or someone in organization suspects this) then you need to access your NTBackup created media and potentially recover data.  But Windows Server 2008 no longer has NTbackup; Vista omitted the same thing.

What to do?  Download the above nifty utility or go to a Windows 2003 Server or XP workstation you still have access to.  With the utility you can keep it all in house at the business network which keeps thing simple.

KISS is a DU-IT best practice.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Oh no! My email address got blasted out by my new friend, a business associate, or maybe Mom. What to say?

April 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The premise here is that email blasts occur regularly and usually it involves a sales deal, an event of some kind, or around a cause.  Chain letters are another notorious source for guilt-tripping the recipient to forward it out to all your friends or else be a real lousy individual; and these actually still work year in year out.

The blast can be done safely if people still feel compelled to send such multi-recipient messages out to people who are otherwise complete strangers of each other.  How?   Use the BCC field of course.  Well that of course assumes you knew about BCC.  If you didn’t this post isn’t for you though; rather, it is about you.

My dilemma as a responsible technology professional is to advocate for safe usage of the internet, for people to maintain privacy, and for their identity to remain secure from SPAM’rs or worse.  Often I am doing this with people I’m often barely acquainted.  The internet and email is not as intimate as a face to face heart to heart chat.  It’s a touchy thing to only have email to have these ‘talks’.  So what has been done is that after a blast offense occurs I’ll send an email back to the originator with a scripted reply message.

This blog is written because, I want to know what other people say. Do you say anything at all?  How does my message stack up against what you are saying?  Please comment away as I’d like to make it effective and brief.  …so here goes:

Thank you for considering my interest and sharing this information with me.

I’ve got a small request that I hope you’ll honor.  As a technology service provider and small business owner, information security and privacy are key issues that I must guard for my own sake and for my clients.  Please understand that by including my name and email address in the ‘To’  or ‘CC’ field populated with many others that some of them may again forward the email much like you have.  If they do then my email address and identity get circulated.  This then exposes my email identity as well as any others in the To and CC fields to future SPAM and other undesirable unintended consequences.

The good news is this is an unnecessary risk; so I have an easy fix and request.  In the future when and if you send an email to me along with an audience of others (a blast message) please add me to the ‘BCC’ (blind carbon copy) field and not to not to the “To” or “Cc” fields; in practice it would be a good neighborly thing to do this for everyone who’s a recipient.  This on the net is called good “netiquette” and an overall appreciated best practice by anyone who’s ever received SPAM or who has had their identity stolen (I have).  As for what address to put in the “To” field just insert your own email or any secondary email address.  It is important though that the address be valid or else this is a criteria which SPAM filters will trigger and the email may not reach some of your BCC recipients.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Human Engineering · SPAM · Security